![]() ![]() ![]() Users who dare to click that Unison button may have to have their teeth re-enamelled. The OB-Xa may be the single phattest sounding instrument we have ever heard. The OB-Xa, however, added a 24 dB filter to the OB-X's 12 dB job and, in fact, you could create layered sounds that combined both for a more complex and engaging sound.Īnd what a sound it was. Like the OB-X that preceded it, the OB-Xa was available in four-, six- or eight-voice versions and sported a somewhat simplified dual oscillator signal path. We could have picked the OB-X or OB-8 for our list, but we chose the one smack dab in the middle, the OB-Xa. It worked a treat and begat a number of follow-ups, each with its own specific qualities and refinements, and each with its own loyal following. ![]() Oberheim had a bit of a re-think after the Prophet-5 whizzed by, and took the best of its previous designs and combined them into the huge OB-X. ![]() They sounded immense, but they were difficult to manage, to say the least. There was even a rudimentary programmer available that could store some (but not all) of the parameters for later recall. modules into a case, attaching a keyboard and expecting the user to identically tweak each individual S.E.M. It offered polyphony in the form of its OB Four and Eight Voice instruments, achieved by strapping a handful of its S.E.M. Oberheim had, in reality, been there before Sequential. Some attempted to bring the cost of programmable polyphonic synthesizers down, while others, like Oberheim, attempted to put their own stamp on 'em. Monosynths were declared dead almost overnight, and if your synth couldn't store sounds, you might as well have scrapped it for parts.Įvery manufacturer that could afford to do so began pumping out competitive products. The success of Sequential Circuits' Prophet-5 shook the synth industry. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |